After the Great Cold: The Epigravettien in Austria and the Grubgraben site

grubgraben epi aggsbachgrubgraben epi aggsbach

This is a short (3,5 cm long) and rather thick endscraper from the Grubgraben site in Lower Austria, found at the beginning of the last century, dated to ca 18 k.a. BP. To my knowledge most the Grubgraben material is stored at the Krahuletz Museum in Eggenburg (http://www.krahuletzmuseum.at/startseite/schausammlung/archaeologie.html), where I saw an exhibition about this site some years ago.

The Last Glacial Maximum played a more important role in cultural adaptation than it was expected previously. During this time period, the western part of central Europe appeared as an area of remarkable demographic decrease. A more regular network of sites is recorded in the eastern part of central Europe, namely in the Carpathian Basin and parts of Lower Austria, which seemed to have functioned as one of the European refugia.

Industries from Middle Danube region dated after the Last Glacial Maximum (20-15 k.a. BP (Grubgraben, Rosenburg,  Langmannersdorf, Saladorf, Stránská skála, Szágvár, Arka, Kasov upper layer, Lipa) have some common features and have been described as “Epigravettian”. Alberndorf, once dated to the LGM and classified as “Epiaurignacian”, has now securely dated to a late Aurignacian at 28 k.a. BP (AMS).

In terms of raw material exploitation and economy, there was more emphasis on local sources, although long distance lithic provisioning is documented  in small quantities at some sites (for example Obsidian from Slovakia and Hungary in  lower Austria at Grubgraben and Rosenburg). Some sites were located directly in the vicinity of the outcrops and display the character of primary workshops (Arka, Lipa). Other sites may represent short hunting camps / kill sites (Stranska Skála; Saladorf) of  horse and reindeer. Grubgraben seems to have been a major aggregation site with repeated settlement and a diversified lithic industry.

Contrary to the Gravettian based predominantly on lithic imports and producing long blades from the classical crested and prismatic cores, the Epigravettian blanks (flakes, shorter blades, microblades) are usually produced from short and cubical cores as well as from elongated blade cores.

Typologically, the groups of short endscrapers and burins predominate, but their quantitative relationship may be flexible at the individual sites. Both types are usually made on short blanks. Some of them are thick and some are polyhedric, thus recalling “Aurignacian” forms, but the quantity of these types is low. The backed implements, previously used as the key argument for continuity of the Gravettian tradition, are also present but are in fact less frequent than expected within an industry, that is called “Epigravettian”. Indeed there are great differences to the Epigravettian industries at the Balkans and in Italy, but we lack of comparative data about this issue.

The bone-and-antler industry, whenever preserved, shows parallels to the Magdalenian but also to the preceding Gravettian at Krems Wachtberg, Willendorf, Dolni Vestonice and the Swabian caves (“bâtons de commandement” at Grubgraben, and Ságvár, “spatulas” needles and a flute at Grubgraben) .

At Grubgraben, artifacts made of different raw materials were found. Fine-grained flints resembled in their mineralogical composition the raw material of Stránská skála. The radiolarites had in part parallels with those from the Váh basin. 2-5% of the artifacts  were made of quartz. Endscrapers were the most frequent tool type, followed by burins, backed bladelets and marginally retouched tools. Obermaier (1908) and Brandtner (1989) described  thick (“Aurignacoid”) endscrapers on flakes, (“Mousteroid”) sidescrapers and multiple fine borers-similar to that of the contemporaneous  Badegoulian in France and the Mezinian.

These are pages from Obermaiers publication(1908): Die am Wagramdurchbruch des Kamp gelegenen niederösterreichischen Quartärfundplätze: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des älteren Jungpaläolithikum in Mitteleuropa. At this time the site was classified as “Aurignacien moyen” and compared to the Hudssteig site at Krems. A nice example of a misleading typological approach..

kammern grubgraben aggsbach kammern1

About the Austrian Paleolithic:

www.landesmuseum.at/pdf_frei…/31560.pdf

http://www.oeaw.ac.at/praehist/fileadmin/template/main/res/pdf/pal_lit/

http://www.orea.oeaw.ac.at/en/research/quartaerarchaeologie/kammern-grubgraben/grubgraben-feldforschungen/

 

1569 Views since 2/2016 1 Views Today
This entry was posted in Plaeolithics and Neolithics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to After the Great Cold: The Epigravettien in Austria and the Grubgraben site

  1. Pingback: Fallen out of Time: “Anachronistic Tools” | Aggsbach's Paleolithic Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *